
How Ethiopia’s new media law undermines regulatory independence and press freedom
Ethiopia’s parliament has ratified an amendment to the country’s Mass Media Proclamation that dramatically reshapes how the Ethiopian Media Authority (EMA) is governed. The changes transfer nomination powers for the EMA’s leadership to the executive, strip away transparency and conflict-of-interest safeguards from board appointments, and consolidate licensing and disciplinary powers within the Authority itself, effectively hollowing out institutional checks designed to protect regulatory independence. Taken together with an intensifying pattern of arrests, raids, and threats against reporters, the legal changes mark a decisive shift that risks transforming the regulator from a potential defender of media pluralism into an instrument of state control. The mechanics of capture Before the amendment, the House of Peoples’ Representatives (HoPR) appointed the EMA’s director general through a public nomination process that include reserved seats for civil-society and media representatives, as well as a ban on political-party membership for board members. Under the new framework, the

